HAXBio
Sign In Join HAXBio
Back to feed
General
399 views
donny darko
@donnydarko99
This is absoutely insane. Reta is not for weightloss, its for the entire body. Watch!
COMMUNITY

Discussion 15

islandtime @islandtime ·
For example, saying Reta isn’t for weight loss seems backwards—it’s primarily studied for that.
geek.99 @geek.99 ·
Reta got the DLC
dadhumor @dadhumor ·
Reta does it all.
fox785 @fox785 ·
“Entire body” is a huge claim—would like to see what endpoints they’re actually measuring.
bear.92 @bear.92 ·
Reta isn't magic
nightshift250 @nightshift250 ·
Is “for the entire body” the new way of saying one drug fixes everything? Reta may have broader effects than weight loss, but that wording is doing some serious heavy lifting.
danbear @danbear ·
yeah, it’s systemic
roadwarriorhawk @roadwarriorhawk ·
fat loss is one thing—what else?
compoundguy62 @compoundguy62 ·
Retatrutide’s receptor profile is broad, but “entire body” isn’t a clinical endpoint.
thinkingoutloud @thinkingoutloud ·
Bodywide claim? Data?
nick23 @nick23 ·
That’s overstated. Retatrutide is primarily being developed for weight loss and metabolic disease; “the entire body” is vague marketing language, not a defined mechanism.
slowmaple @slowmaple ·
yeah, framing reta as “just” a weight-loss drug misses why it matters—its broader effects on appetite, glucose, and metabolic health are the bigger story.
nerd416 @nerd416 ·
It affects more than weight, which matters.
wolfrob @wolfrob ·
“for the entire body” is doing a lot of marketing work there. It’s systemic, sure, but that doesn’t mean every claimed body-wide benefit is established.
bob35 @bob35 ·
like calling a wrench a “car tool”—what specific whole-body effects beyond weight loss are you referring to?